Orijit Sen – River of Stories (Article in the Kindle magazine)

Backlisting, my new column to write about books and publishing, started this month in the Kindle magazine from Calcutta. The plan for the column is to take an interesting non-canon book from Indian writing in English each month and do a review/interview/anecdote-chasing/study of publishing history, as much as I’m allowed to do within the space of one article.

The first instalment is on River of Stories by Orijit Sen, presumably the first graphic novel in English to be published in India. I spoke to Sen at his People Tree studio on a violently rainy afternoon in Delhi, two days before I packed up and left the city. I came home to Calcutta, also flooded, and there was no sun, no air, no internet signal in my ground-floor bedroom. I wrote the article mostly at the newly acquired and very spacious quarters of Jadavpur University Press, in the intermittent (and very cheering-up) company of Tintin’da, Rimi’di, Deeptanil’da, Debo. Somak came over and fed me biscuits one day when I was quietly starving. Ah well, excuse the spurt of homesickness. Here’s the article that came out of those days.

River of Stories by Orijit Sen (Possibly the only extant copy)
River of Stories by Orijit Sen (Possibly the only extant copy)

Orijit Sen sits at his desk in an inner room of his sprawling and chaotic studio upstairs from the People Tree store in Hauz Khas Village. Inside a wooden bookcase at one corner of this room lives the only physical copy of River of Stories I know. It is tattered and discoloured, with the gum on the spine dried up and several of the pages come loose. This is not the copy I had read. As a young student in Calcutta six or seven years ago, I had downloaded the book in a CBR file from a torrent site I can no longer locate. When I mention this to Sen, he is not displeased. For the past many years, anyone who comes looking for River of Stories to the older People Tree store in Connaught Place is allowed to take a printout of the pages. The book has been out of print since its first publication in 1994.

Graphic novels in India have a chequered and not very long history. The medium came into widespread appreciation only after the publication of Sarnath Banerjee’s Corridor in 2004 by Penguin Books India. It was around the time when people started asking about River of Stories again, Sen tells me, but when he wrote and published the book—more than ten years before—there was little awareness and lesser to look forward to. The sixty-two-page-long book was a labour of love, written and illustrated over three years at Sen’s own expense—a leap considerably large for a comics creator, for the production process is more entwined with the creation of a comic book than it is with text. Art supplies and paper are expensive. Reimagining and drawing a panel is considerably more time- and labour-intensive than rewriting a paragraph in text. If factors such as page size, quality and texture of paper, whether the comic book would be in colour or in black and white are decided too late in the process, whatever has already been created may even need to be entirely discarded and recreated from scratch.

Fortunately for Sen, who was newly out of NID Ahmedabad and got interested in the Narmada Bachao Andolan around 1990, there were friends and others who understood his medium and as well as his vision. Through his participation in protests about the Narmada valley and his visits to the affected areas, he had befriended activist and musician Rahul Ram (key member of Indian Ocean, a band that would later produce the acclaimed hit ‘Ma Rewa’ from a folk song of the Vindhyas) and his then wife Amita Baviskar, a sociologist who was researching the tribal myths of the Bhilala people of Madhya Pradesh, inhabitants of the area in which River of Stories is based. His friends arranged for Sen to receive a publishing grant via the environmental-issues’ NGO Kalpavriksh—a government grant that went into the making of a book supporting an anti-government protest, Sen chuckles in reminiscence. With the grant he went out to find a printing press. His budget did not allow printing in colour but Sen insisted on using a particular kind of thick semi-glossy paper which the press he selected happened to have at that time. The size of the paper decided the page size of the book—at 8-by-11 inches, slightly smaller than an A4-sized page—and its quality lent crispness and detail to the black-and-white art, which Sen put to efficient use all through. The lettering was done by hand by Baviskar.

River of Stories is a succinct and visually sumptuous work on the subject of the Narmada Bachao Andolan. Vishnu, a young journalist from Delhi, goes on a journey to Ballanpur to do a story on the reactions of the protesters and the locals, following a road that Sen himself may have taken. Interspersed with the narrative of Vishnu is the story of Malgu Gayan and the birth of the river Narmada (known locally and in the book as Rewa)—soft grey and pencil-shaded, as opposed to the fluid, cartoonish quality of the Vishnu strand of the story—rendering each panel like a painting. The two narratives come together as the story progresses, and so do the two styles of art. This technique is not entirely unprecedented, but Sen’s use of it in River of Stories receives significance from the fact that the Narmada Bachao Andolan questioned a development model that prescribed the replacement of age-old—and till then quite independent and self-sustaining—tribal cultures with large-scale modern structures for agriculture and industrialization. When Malgu Gayan of myth steps into Vishnu’s world, the transition is seamless not only due to Sen’s mastery of his medium, but also because the adivasis of the Narmada valley are still largely similar in both attire and perspective about the world.

Elsewhere in the book, in an overwhelming three-page-long pullout, Sen—who considers the double spread the basic unit of a comic-book story—depicts the course of the river Narmada from its source in Ambarkhant to the Rewasagar dam under construction, a map that transcends the topographical and becomes, as he calls it, ‘a map of stories told and as yet untold’. The map is superscripted with stories spoken in many voices, from Malgu Gayan singing the creation myth of the river on his rangai to the adivasis protesting in Hindi and urban activists explaining the ecological and humanitarian consequences of the dam-building projects.

After having printed River of Stories, Orijit Sen went around bookstores in Delhi trying to distribute it. He was met with baffled questions—was it a book for children? Why was the spine so thin? Even the bookstores that hesitantly agreed to sell the book would accept no more than five or ten copies. A few hundred copies were kept by Kalpavriksh to be sold at its events, but the rest of the stock remained with Sen, to be sold over the next five or six years from his independent People Tree store. “My friends and the people at Kalpavriksh loved it,” says Sen, “but at that time there was no impact on the media or the general public at all.” The author Khushwant Singh— who was sent a copy of the book, enjoyed it and invited Sen for a chat afterwards—was the only one who covered it in the media when he mentioned it briefly in his column in the Hindustan Times. Reader responses were few and far between, but also sometimes charmingly unexpected—for instance, a letter Sen received from a schoolteacher in Ethiopia who had somehow landed a copy of the book. It wasn’t until ten years later, with the rise in interest in graphic novels following Corridor, that Amitabh Kumar—fellow comics creator and a member of the Pao Collective, a comics ensemble started by Sen and a few others—made a scan of the only remaining copy of River of Stories and put it up online, the file that had made its way to my hands.

Back in the 1990s, though, the only substantial return from River of Stories was a WHO-and-NACO commission Sen received to put together a comics anthology about AIDS awareness in Manipur three years later. Lack of funding kept him from creating other longer works, but he continued to make short pieces in his own time, including a series of one-page shorts called Telling Tales for the India Magazine. The greater part of his years, however, had been occupied in establishing People Tree, which now has two branches in Delhi and one in Goa. Today, as both the store and the Pao Collective have caught the interest of a receptive public, Sen intends to republish River of Stories with a new prologue for the Pao Reader in 2014. (The first book from the collective, called the Pao Anthology, was published by Penguin Books India in 2012.) Reverberating with his distinct creative sense in both story and art, one hopes this will bring greater appreciation to non-fiction comics creation in India.

And this is a link to the article on the website of Kindle.

Weekend Writing: Commercial Publishing vs Self-Publishing

This started out because a friend linked me to an article with author John Green’s opinion on self-publishing. He said it would bring a smile on my face. He knows me well.

I have not yet read John Green’s literature, although I’ve heard good things about him and have been curious for a while. But he seemed beautifully expressive in the article, and I agree with everything he says, and it made me want to add a few things of my own.

Of course, I work in the commercial (‘trade’) publishing industry, so my opinion is likely to be biased. I chose to do this job. I had the privilege to choose. People who buy and read trade books also have the privilege to make those choices. (I’m yet to meet a real-life person who forsakes a day’s meal to buy and read a book, although let’s assume for the argument’s sake that these people exist. They’ll still be a painful minority.) They have the privilege of having acquired a certain kind of leisure and a certain taste. They have the privilege of literacy. They have the privilege of a functioning eyesight. Like any other form of entertainment or art, reading is a kind of privilege, a step of improvement over the indispensable roti-kapda-makaan (which, hey, are also things a lot of people are doing without!). It’s all essentially a circle of privilege. You are inside it as much as I am. Let’s not delude ourselves about that before we get to the ‘particular’ privilege of being commercially published.

So… this thing about commercial publishing being the oppressive monstrosity. And about self-publishing being its wonderful, magical alternative that will free the world in all its expressive glory. There are many levels of approaching this debate, so let me start from a random point (not the best or the only point to start, obviously). Commercial publication, as we know, is a long and many-step process. Usually, if you are starting out:

  • You have to write a work that is of a certain length, and fits into a certain recognizable genre
  • You do some research on which publishing houses are in existence, and how you can contact them
  • You send them your work
  • Someone, often a junior editor or intern, goes through your work initially and pronounces it to be of any merit at all
  • This is forwarded to a senior editor, who examines your work more comprehensively, envisions where it stands vis-a-vis other existing works in the market (and in history), checks for plagiarism and so on, basically thinks of it as a book
  • If s/he likes it, a discussion happens with the sales department to consider the profitability of the book to the company
  • And if all these people share a good vibe about your work, the publishing house gets back to you and your work is accepted.

There are other, later, equally important steps involved, but let’s consider these initial few. Your work can get stalled from being commercially published at any of these levels, without having been entirely worthless. Let’s say you’re a brilliant innovator of genre and subject matter, and none of these editors quite understand your work and none of these sales people can figure out who will buy it. This has happened. They give birth to historical mistakes (and publishing-class legends) like J.K. Rowling or Chetan Bhagat, to name two.

On the other hand, what people on the other side of the table often seem to forget, is that this is extremely rare. People in big publishing houses are not idiots. The bigger the publishing house, it’s likelier that their staff are highly qualified individuals who occupy their positions for a reason. They are rigorously selected by other highly qualified individuals and paid well enough to stay there, or head-hunted away to bigger, more lucrative jobs. Basic ignorance or lack of farsightedness does not, usually, stand that level of competence. These people do understand books. They bring out intellectually and commercially successful books all the time. They have probably judged, approved of and published the books you love. Till now, you have admired and agreed with their judgement. (That’s why you sent them your work in the first place, didn’t you?) They’re not the brainless, soulless, sold-out monsters that they have suddenly turned into in your eyes.

However, yes, a big publishing house has to make a great deal of profit to survive, and an uninterrupted flow of profit, and sometimes (but only sometimes) a work that some people liked is rejected because the effort of processing and publishing it will be much greater than the profit it’s likely to make. (Usually so great that it will neutralize the profits made from other books, because believe it or not, big publishing houses bring out more non-profit books than you have any idea. They balance them out against the more profitable books, which is a liberty a big publishing house may take, and it does so as much as possible. So your work has to be really, really, incredibly unprofitable to get rejected despite being liked.)

Which is what brings me to small, independent publishers.
So these are publishing houses which are still commercial or profit-making enterprises (and therefore ‘trade’), but they operate on a smaller scale, have fewer employees (and therefore fewer steps before your work gets selected or rejected), and usually specialize in themes not well represented in the ‘mainstream’. Sometimes this may be a social cause (feminism, caste equality, LGBT equality etc.), or it may be a generic or subjective preference (poetry, philosophy, SFF, comics, romance and so on). Usually, the people working at these publishing houses are passionate about their specialization and less concerned with profit (which does not make their counterparts at the bigger publishing houses any less sincere or more brilliant, but that’s the topic for another discussion), so if your work is a dazzling instance of non-mainstream literature, go find yourself the right independent publisher and you’re golden. This will come with a like-minded person (or a small bunch of like-minded people) who will intimately enjoy your work and share your vision, and bring you the kind of readers who do so in turn. You will probably get a smaller distribution or visibility, but believe me, even if a big publisher brought out your work and it was a commercial failure, the result would be more or less the same after the initial month or two. Not all Penguin books are on the front shelf of Starmark or the homepage of Flipkart. Not every book gets launched in five cities. And even though you get to keep your advance, honestly, it won’t pay your bills for a very long time. Books don’t make you rich, whoever you publish them from, unless you are, I suppose, J.K. Rowling or Chetan Bhagat. (Are you J.K. Rowling or Chetan Bhagat? Please feel free to leave your number in my message box. Big fan! Ah well.)

***

Therefore, if you’re even a remotely well-informed or commonsensical person, you’re not thinking of publishing as something that will make you a millionaire. What else might commercial publishing deprive you of when it refuses to publish your work?
Respect.
A sense of legitimacy.
An ISBN number.
An entry into most libraries and bookstores.
So on.
This (finally) brings me to the point of my note.

It is an excellent thing, on principle, that self-publishing exists. It would never be a truly democratic world where it didn’t. My knowledge of literary history is not quite impressive… but hey, William Blake? You take my point.

My problem is with the suggestion that self-publishing is the only thing that should exist, and that it should dismantle the hierarchy of the commercial publishing establishment, until everything is equal and free.
Sorry, but no.

Commercial publishing, more than anything, is a system of peer review. Even when they are judging your work for profit, it’s a bunch of well-trained and experienced individuals deciding whether this work will be liked enough by a projected group of people to spend their money on. The ‘projected group of people’ may vary. I’m the only person I know who enjoys both Umberto Eco and Ravinder Singh, but these ‘well-trained and experienced individuals’ usually present both Umberto Eco and Ravinder Singh to the people who will buy them, and they have a fairly accurate idea if either of these groups will buy your work next. (Or, in case of an independent publishing house, they know one group of people very well, and again, can predict whether this group will buy your work.) Think of the way you buy a book, especially if you’re a frugal buyer. You will probably borrow a book you’re not very sure you’ll like. You only buy a book when you’re sure it will be great. It’s not an accurate system of judgement and there’s often a considerable margin of error, but give me a better one.

And the reason why this peer review is indispensable is that ‘basic writing’ is so easy. Unlike music or filmmaking or dance or even painting, writing is not a specialized or expensive skill. Anyone can write, as long as they are literate and have ten rupees (five rupees?) to buy a notebook and a pencil. Anyone can ‘publish online’ as long as they have an Internet connection — starting a blog is free. (Typesetting or making a PDF needs a little more skill, but that is not essentially literary skill. And if you have the skill, it doesn’t take much effort.) A sufficiently self-contained individual can ‘write a book’ without any interference from a second person or any imposition of quality control at any stage. All this sounds excellent and liberating. What is my problem?

My problem is this — I associate a certain kind of sincerity and seriousness of intent with the effort of having to cross a hurdle, which I believe will entirely disappear if (god forbid) self-publishing becomes the norm. The necessity to prove your worth to a bunch of fairly knowledgable people (us hard-hearted publishing professionals, hi!) is also the drive to improve your work until it meets their standards. It is what has gone out of poetry in my time. Poetry books don’t sell > pretty much everyone vanity/self-publishes > no one is quite sure what’s good or bad poetry any more. The entire discipline of criticism seems to have decayed. All the time I find people ‘publishing’ poetry books that should be allowed to exist in no possible universe, and a lot of these people aren’t underprivileged or the subaltern in any sense, so there’s no reason (or none that I can see) why their rampant travesty should be allowed to flourish… except that, hey, no one’s doing the ‘allowing’ there any more. (Of course, the reasons why poetry has come to this are long and convoluted, and right now, not entirely relevant. I’m just interested in what happens once that dystopia descends.) There’s absolutely no impetus on the writer to come back heartbroken from a rejection and re-read their work, introspect on where exactly it is failing to fit the bill of the people who have just declared they could live without it. (The introspection can lead to many possible conclusions, but first there needs to be the bill that triggers it.) There isn’t even — no more — that all-important tug at the purse strings, which effectively sets so many priorities straight for our (morally depraved, alas) race. I’m not buying a piano because I don’t know if my half-hearted playing will ever justify the price. I won’t waste money on a car because my driving is shaky at its best. But hell, I’ll write a novel and I’ll publish it on my blog; and I’ll rail against the commercial publisher who rejected it, and the friend whom I forced to read who didn’t quite ‘get’ it, and the non-existent reader who never stops by my blog, and fate for not giving me my rightful share . . . and somehow, I am the person who’ll be completely correct and justified and non-delusional in each of these circumstances. I am the misunderstood genius. The ‘system’, as usual, is wrong.

That, precisely, is the difference between today’s self-publishing and the self-publishing of yore. Blake didn’t click the ‘publish’ button on a blog — he painstakingly engraved each of his poems, illustrated and relief-etched them, coloured them individually, bound them and probably peddled them as well. He definitely spent a great deal more money than he was comfortably making. That kind of complete and relentless dedication means you’re either a certified genius or a certified madman, but nothing more casual or in-between. Just like buying the piano or the car, a lot of today’s rampantly self-publishing authors would probably make the run for it if that level of relentlessness was demanded of them, and the world would almost certainly be better for it.

Besides, while Blake didn’t have a publisher, he was not working in complete isolation and rejection of other people’s opinion. It’s just that commercial publishing options were fewer in his time. In stark, stark contrast, commercial publishing options are so many these days that I’d be actually surprised if any work of even the tiniest amount of real value goes unappreciated any more. (And if they do, I’m fairly sure they are being written at the very far, inaccessible margins and almost certainly not being lazily blogged.) While the bigger publishers have always favoured the more ‘mainstream’ literature, I believe independent publishers of today are the reincarnations of those relentlessly dedicated, pathbreaking, revolutionary people, constantly striving to meet the similar kind of work halfway. They begin their publishing houses while working other day jobs to make ends meet, without knowing whether they’ll ever recover the costs. Most of them multitask at insane levels and keep at it for years, day in and day out. And as long as the ‘matter’ is what they want, they are willing to work with all kinds of deficiencies in language, expression, imaginativeness, obscurity — any kind of obstacle to literary conformity at all. These days, if no publisher, big or small, mainstream or specialized, is willing to give you the time of day — even if you pay them money to produce your book — then maybe it’s time you sat down and did some serious, serious rethinking.

And all the processes of award-giving, syallbus-making, canon-building, shoulder-rubbing, acquisition of successful authors by bigger publishing houses and so on — while they have their own internal mechanisms, not always the noblest — are necessary precisely because of the maintenance of this standard, without which this entire system will collapse. The system must exist, so that people fight it hard both fit in and stand out, whichever suits their tastes, but to make sure that they do fight it hard. The system must exist so that every randomly strung together sequence of words is not a ‘work of literature’. If you went to the same school as I did, happen to have an Internet connection and a blog, aren’t being persecuted by your government or generally cut off from the rest of civilization, please don’t bother to self-publish. It’s likely to be trash.